Skip to content
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. Why managing a complex project with multiple contractors is a risk, and how to avoid it

Insights · 15 May 2026

Why managing a complex project with multiple contractors is a risk, and how to avoid it

The real challenge in complex projects is coordination, not technology: why a fragmented supply chain creates risk and what a single point of contact changes.

Project team reviewing technical drawings around the meeting table, workshop image on the screen

In complex industrial projects, it is often assumed that the main challenge lies in the project itself: sophisticated systems, advanced technologies and processes that demand precision. These aspects certainly require expertise and reliability. But the real challenge is not building the product. It is managing the project as a whole, and therefore coordinating all the contractors involved.

The real challenge is coordination, not complexity

In sectors such as Oil & Gas, Power Generation and Defence & ATC, projects are never linear: product specifications evolve, customisations alter the design, multiple suppliers must be aligned, timelines are strict, and the finished system must reach a site that may be on another continent, safely and on time. Managing a project does not simply mean designing and manufacturing a system. It also means orchestrating multidisciplinary engineering, structural supply chains, system integration, testing and certification, and the preparation of large modules for international shipment.

Yet, in most cases, this process is still managed through a fragmented network of suppliers.

How complex projects are typically managed

In the traditional model, a project is divided among multiple players: engineering firms, fabrication workshops, electrical and HVAC system suppliers, integration companies, surface treatment and finishing providers, logistics operators. This creates a chain of distributed responsibilities, where each player optimises its own scope but no one has full control over the final outcome.

The critical issues of a fragmented model

1. Unmanaged interfaces

Each handover between suppliers becomes a critical point: technical incompatibilities, alignment delays, unclear responsibilities.

2. Timelines that are difficult to control

Each phase depends on the previous one. Delays cascade, and installation and commissioning become hard to plan.

3. Hidden indirect costs

Not only production costs, but also internal coordination, supplier management, rework and modifications.

4. Operational risks on site

The more activities are left to the site, the higher the exposure to errors, the longer the installation times, and the greater the impact on safety and operations.

All of this inevitably raises concerns for the client. Who is responsible if something does not work? Who coordinates the project? How can delivery timelines be guaranteed?

A different approach: a single point of contact

To overcome these challenges, the model must change. Albizzati Group operates as a single-source supplier, managing all project phases internally and acting as the sole point of contact for the client, through Albizzati International Project. This means greater control across all phases, higher certainty on production and delivery timelines, and improved efficiency at every stage. The result is a system designed, built and delivered as a cohesive whole, not as a sum of separate parts.

Where control begins: the production cycle

At the core of this model is a fully integrated production cycle. We manage in-house engineering and design; structural fabrication and machining; surface treatments and protection; assembly, system integration and cabling; testing and quality control; packing and preparation for shipment, with direct dockside loading at the port of Livorno for oversized modules. This makes it possible to eliminate critical interfaces, ensure continuity between phases and maintain control over time, cost and quality. See the six phases of our production cycle.

What this means in practice for the client

Moving from a fragmented model, where multiple parties handle different project phases, to a model where the entire production cycle is managed by a single partner means:

  • Reduced management complexity
  • Lower operational risk
  • Greater predictability
  • Better-controlled timelines
  • Clear accountability

Above all: less energy spent on coordination, more focus on the project itself. Reducing the number of contractors involved is not just an organisational choice. It is a strategy to increase reliability, efficiency and operational safety. The five 67-metre Field Auxiliary Rooms delivered for an LNG plant in Canada show what this looks like on a real EPC contract.

Rely on a single partner for your next project: get in touch with Albizzati Group.